Seize the male gaze of production

We first saw it with the formula one models getting cancelled. The assassination of the “male gaze” not by feminists who want to protect female spaces or mock pseudo “red pill” meninists. Not by Christians who believe we should ban porn and not have sex outside marriage. No. These women claim they simultaneously want to victimize and empower us. That they can now tell models and show business personalities how to act and how to dress. But with absolutely no issue with men sharing women’s spaces or competing in women’s sports (most actual transgender people don’t want this). 

Upon my interaction with intersectional feminists some of them seemed to preach sexual liberation led to power. No doubt. But women who understand the male gaze enjoy it, and don’t do it to overpower men.

This was quickly followed by victimization of the women they so claim to admire. Attempts to destroy them or vilify and destroy the men who put them in that position. The anti-sex movement didn’t come from the right. It came from the postmodern left. 

Women like Bianca Censori understand and enjoy the “male gaze”. A model who is monogamous with one man and poses nude isn’t a wh*re even by the most conservative Christian standards. It’s been done before. This is more apparent in Hip Hop culture and most women show business do it more subtly. 

We also see a common socialist tendency so called “doszukiwanie się patologii” forcibly searching for and ultimately creating dysfunction in influential figures and thinkers that don’t tow the party line. This is a process which follows the conflict theory on a micro-scale. Family members and friends are turned against each other and convinced to separate and fight, eventually manifesting the dysfunction they hoped for. Most individuals do not recover from this. 

And quickly the women-support-women movement is shown as to what it really is. Seize the means of production. Subvert and destroy the male gaze. And ultimately, what they hate the most. Beauty.